Paris Risk Group 2015 workshop

Hosted by and at the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM).

Location

Bilthoven, Netherlands

Event Dates

June 18-19 2015

About the Event

In January 2013 the Paris Risk Group (PRG), a network of social scientists working in or with risk agencies on food, environment, public and occupational health and consumer safety across Europe and beyond, held its first workshop.

In 2015, the third annual workshop of the PRG will be held. It will be hosted by and at the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment on June 18th and 19th, 2015 inBilthoven, the Netherlands. It will gather about 45 participants from different countries (mainly EU) involved in risk assessment and/or risk management activities.

The overall theme of the workshop is ‘Evidence based innovation, the quality of information and its use in risk assessment and risk management’.

Innovation is considered an important tool for governments and institutions to drive economic growth, create jobs, build a green society and improve quality of life: we innovate because we can (technically possible) or have to (budgets down) or want to (ambitious aims). Risk agencies are called upon to provide scientific evidence regarding the consequences of innovation. In that context, social sciences, by providing additional types of knowledge, beyond the “natural sciences”, can make a specific contribution. Social sciences can offer insights on adapting the risk analysis process to the more complex, ambiguous and uncertain issues at stake with innovation. Social sciences can help to shed light on critical points of expert appraisal, the procedures for selecting and validating knowledge or the effects of disciplinary framing, thereby improving the transparency and the rigor of the assessments. Social sciences can provide a better understanding of the behaviour and the positioning of stakeholders. They also provide analysis of societal concerns surrounding environment and public health issues in relation to innovations considered, improving the relevance and the comprehensiveness of recommendations on regulatory measures, on their impacts and other solutions. Thereby, with ‘evidence based innovation’ we mean that the empirically founded contribution from the social sciences can improve the risk information and risk assessments carried out in the context of development of innovative technologies and new products put on the market.

Presentations below

Related documents

Maria P. Escobar Tella_Record-keeping, regulation, and animal welfare Nov 2015 Slide show Slide show
Virgil Rerimassie_SynBio Politics Exploring Political Views on Synthetic Biology in The Netherlands Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Ashwin Ramadhin_Opening the social sciences participation tool box to stimulate risk governance practices Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Jeroen Devilee_Obstacles for risk governance : When normative models meet everyday practices in an Institute for Public Health and Environment Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Marine Spaak_Typology of French NGOs working on animal welfare Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Danielle Timmermans_Innovation and ambivalent attitudes: implications for risk communication Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Goda Perlaviciute_Perceived risks and benefits of wind energy developments Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Harro Van Lente_Claims about risks and benefits as ingredients of innovation Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Régine Boutrais_Anses dialogue committee on « Nanomaterials & health » Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Daniel Benamouzig_Introducing social sciences in risk assessment: the case of ANSES (France) Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Josquin Debaz_Informed Expert with Impaired Judgment the Circular Problematic of Conflict of Interest Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Sander Clahsen_Different roles and viewpoints of scientists as policy advisors Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Aura Timen_Exploring risk perception and information needs to improve preventive behaviour during outbreaks Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Desiree Beaujean_Salmonella outbreak : Knowledge, perceptions, behavior & sources of information during an outbreak in the Netherlands Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Lianne Schol_Ebola risk perception in the Netherlands Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Trevor Webb_Trust makers breakers & brokers : Trust & food incidents Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Astrid Epp_Governance of Nanotechnology – Research, Protection, Communication Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Tom Jansen_What is an uncertain risk? A scoping (conceptual) review Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Frederick Bouder_Regulatory transparency in Europe: more science needed Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Trevor Webb_Social sciences in Australian food regulation Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Hanneke Kruize_Nature-based solutions and healthy urban living: clashing experiences Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Hans Keune_A problem solving turn in environment and health expertise Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Leo Posthuma_Solution-focused risk and sustainability assessments: an inspiring paradigm made operational Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Thomas Bayeux_The socio-economic cost of indoor air pollutants in France: method, results and perspectives for public policy Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Thomas Oberg_The role of CBA/CEA in EU decisions regarding chemical safety Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Eve Feinblatt_Consumer information on prevention of biological hazards: conditions and criteria of effectiveness for various information measures Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Helen Atkinson_Domestic Kitchen Practices Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Hans Keune_Negotiated Complexity: Framing Multi-Criteria Decision Support in Environmental Health Practice Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show
Susan Chilton_Improving Risk‐Risk Trade‐Offs: an Experimental Approach Oct 2015 Slide show Slide show